Grow Or Sell Your Information Technology Company - A Crossroads Decision

Thinking of taking your information technologyenvironment while trying to meet a sales quota.
company to the next level with a major marketingThrow on top of that the objection that he has
campaign or by hiring additional sales resources?never had to deal with before, the small company
These are decisions that can impact your company'srisk factor, and the odds of success diminish. Finally,
future. It might be time to consider the alternative ofthis transformation from a core group of early
selling your business.adapters to now selling to the conservative majority
We are often approached by software company orelongates the sales cycle by 25% to as much as
information technology business owners at adouble his prior experience. If you don't fire him first,
crossroads of taking the company to the next level.he will probably quit when his draw runs out.
The decision in most cases is whether they shouldWith all this going against the business owner, most
bring on the one or two hot shot sales people orof them go ahead and make the hire and then I hear
channel development people necessary to bring thesomething like this, "Yes, we brought on a sales guy
company sales to a level that will allow the companytwo years ago who said he had all the industry
to reach critical mass. For a smaller company withcontacts and in nine months after he hadn't sold a
sales below $5 million this can be a critical decision.thing and cost us a lot of money, we fired him. That
For frame of reference, prior to embarking on myreally hurt the company and we have just now
merger and acquisition advisor career, I spent myrecovered. We won't do that again."
prior 20 years in various sales capacities in primarilyWhat are the alternatives? Certainly strategic
information technology and computer industry relatedalliances, channel partnerships, value added resellers
companies from bag carrying salesman to district,are options, but again the success rate for these
regional, to national sales manager and finally Chiefarrangements are suspect without the sales
Marketing Officer. So when I look at a company, it isbackground in the executive suite. A lower risk
from the sales and marketing perspective first andapproach is to outsource your VP of Sales or Chief
foremost. I am sure that if I had a public accountingMarketing Officer function. There are a number of
background, I would look at my clients through thosehighly experienced and talented free lancers that you
lenses.can hire on a consulting basis that can help you
So with that backdrop, let's look at what might be aestablish a sales and marketing infrastructure and
typical situation. The soft ware company is doing $3.5guide you through the staffing process. That may be
million in sales, has a good group of loyal customers,the best way to go.
produces a nice income for its owner or owners, andAn option that one of our clients chose when faced
has a lot more potential for sales growth in thewith the six points to consider from above was to
opinion of the owner. Some light bulb has been litsell his company. This is a very difficult decision for an
that suggests that they need to step this up to theentrepreneur who by nature is very optimistic about
next level after relying on word of mouth and thethe future and feels like he can clear any hurdle. This
passion and energy of the owner to get to thisclient had no sales background but was a very smart
stage.subject matter expert with an outstanding
I have either spoken with more than 30, primarilybackground as a former consultant with a Big 5
technology based companies over the years thataccounting firm. He did not make the hiring mistake,
have faced this exact situation and can count on onebut instead went the outsourcing of VP of Sales
hand the ones that had a successful outcome. Thefunction as step 1. When their firm wanted to make
natural inclination is to bite the bullet and bring on thatthe transition from the early adapters to the
expensive resource and hope your staff can keep upconservative majority, the sales cycle slowed to a
with the big influx of orders. The reality is that incrawl. Meanwhile their technology advantage was
most cases the execution was a very expensivebeing eroded by a well funded venture backed
failure. Below are several factors that you shouldcompetitor that had struck an alliance with a big
consider when you are at this crossroads:vendor.
1. The 80 20 rule of salesmen. You know this one.They engaged our firm to find them a buyer, but
80% of sales are produced by 20% of thethen we encountered the valuation gap. Our business
salespeople. If you are only hiring one or two, theseller thought his company was worth a great deal
likelihood is that you will not get a top performer.and that he should be paid with cash at close for all
2. The president of the company and decision makerthe future potential his product could deliver. The
has no sales background so the odds of him makingbuyer, on the other hand, wanted to pay based on a
the right hiring decision are greatly diminished. He willtrailing twelve months historical perspective and if
not understand how to properly set milestones,anything was paid for potential, that would be in the
judge progress, evaluate performance objectively, orform of an earn out based on post acquisition sales
coach the new hire.performance.
3. To hire a good salesman that can handle aWith a well structured earn out agreement and the
complex sale requires a base salary and a draw forright buyer, our client will reach his transaction value
at least 6 months that puts him in a better economicgoals. His earn out is based on future sales, but his
condition than he was in on his last job. So you areeffective sales force has been increased from one
probably looking at $150,000 annual run rate for a(himself) to 27 reps. His install base has been
decent candidate.increased from 14 to 800. Every one of the buyer's
4. If you have not had a formalized sales effortcurrent customers is a candidate for this product.
before, you are probably lacking the salesThe small company risk has been removed going
infrastructure that your new hire is used to. Properfrom a little known start-up with $500 K in revenues
contact management systems, customer andto a well known industry player, publicly traded stock
prospect databases, developed collateral materialswith a market cap of $2.5 billion.
and sales presentations, sales cycle timeframes andHe avoided the big cash drain that a bad sales person
critical milestones and developed competition featurehiring decision would have created and he sold his
benefit matrixes will need to be developed.company before a competitor dominated the market
5. Current customers are most likely the earlyand made his technology irrelevant and of minimal
adapters, risk takers, pioneers, etc. and are not afraidvalue.
of making the buying decision with a small more riskyMy professional contacts sometimes tease me and
company. These early adaptors, however, are notsuggest that I think every company should be sold.
viewed as good references for the moreThat may be a slight exaggeration, but in many
conservative majority that needs the security of ainstances, a company sale is the best route. When a
big company backing their product selection decision.information technology business owner is faced with
6. Your new hire is most likely someone that camethat crossroads decision of bringing on a significant
from a bigger information technology company andsales resource that will be faced with a complex sale
may be comfortable performing in an establishedand the executive suite does not have the sales
sales department. It is the rare salesman that canbackground, a company sale may be the best
transform from that environment to developing theoutcome.