Continual Improvement With ISO 9001 - Perception Or Reality

A common perception of the requirement 'continualproduct or service. Logically, they also impact on the
improvement' included within the ISO9001 Standardtask of Sales and Marketing people who have the
(8.5.1) is that in some way it relates to an enhancementresponsibility of persuading potential customers of the
of product or service. Some more serious thoughtuniqueness and superiority of their product. Here we
might divulge this to be a misinterpretation, as thefind the Standard at its weakest and Continuing
document is not a product or service specification, butImprovement a sham.
a system for controlling the quality of the product orIf an organization were to adopt a different approach
service through the output. Title - ' ISO9001:2000to the management of the business, to the
Quality management systems - Requirements'. So, inmanagement of Quality if you prefer, and that
so far as the Standard relates to the organizations'approach directly addressed the cost of generating
output, it defines a control and assurance system thatand delivering the organizations product or service,
should take care of a measure of conformance forTHAT would result in improvement, and probably
the outgoing product. The improvement requirementcontinual improvement.
refers to the manner in which this control is affected.Why would this be dissimilar to the laboriously
Herein lies the real problem with the ISO9000 series, asdeveloped ISO9000 management system? For the
it has little to do with management in the normallysimple rationale that every top management team
accepted definition of that word, and certainly nothingunderstands one language - money. A rationally
to do with business management, which is aboutconstituted cost measurement scheme would include
efficiency, effectiveness and costs. Pressured into an'error free' cost estimates, plus actual measurement of
ISO9000 regime by (in the UK) a governmentcosts incurred due to a failure to achieve the error
sponsored initiative intended to improve the nation'sfree working. We call this the cost of
international image for quality, organisations large andnon-conformance, or perhaps more suitably
small adopted the standard and registration in the belief'Transaction Costs'. If executive managers could be
that this alone would enhance their status in thepersuaded to abandon ISO9000 theory in favour of
market place. At the beginning this was true, but whenthe collection of honest cost data such as this,
competitors were similarly equipped with theirbusiness would - overnight, become more profitable
registered status certificate, and none of thembecause of the actions they would take - or have
demonstrably better than the other, buyers returned totaken for them - to rectify the clear overspend found
their original practice of buying against criteria that didby this approach.
not include ISO9000 registration. Clearly the ContinuingGenerally this will not happen. Not due to any difficulty
Improvement aspect of the document was either aor inability to collect this data, but an inbuilt belief by
myth, wasn't being implemented, or didn't relate to whatvirtually everyone not familiar with Eastern Cultures
the customer wanted.that error & failure is an inevitable consequence of
It seems obvious that if a product or service hashuman endeavour.
achieved an acceptable standard of 'quality' (whateverIn the meantime, managers and their acolytes continue
that might mean to the purchaser), any furtherto hang onto the support strap ISO9000, firm in the
improvement that is to be seen by the purchaser willbelief that a documented system and its certificate will
be in the areas of cost and availability. These are not- as with the Wizard of Oz - be an adequate
features that concern the ISO9000 fraternity; however,substitute for objective thought.
they do impact on the customer's perception of that