How To Resolve CEO's Strategic Concerns That May Preempt Open Innovation

The 2007 CEO Challenges report by The Conferenceminimize the human factor, and of course ...no
Board ranks the CEO's focus on Innovation 9th insurprises.
importance, compared to other strategic interests.To the extent that the wrong vocabulary is used to
This is both good and bad news for the manypromote Innovation Initiatives, these initiatives are not
constituencies in research, development, technologylikely to get off the ground, or they may quickly lose
brokerage or marketing who are eager to participatetop management support. Much of the popular
in expanded innovation strategies within their companydiscussion of the term Open Innovation overlooks
or Open Innovation outside of their company.many of these terminology landmines.
Innovation did beat many other competing priorities toIn discussing the fundamental basis of Open Innovation,
make the top 10.Henry Chesbrough, in chapter 4 of his book Open
What are the CEO's top strategic concerns thatBusiness Models lays out the straightforward solution
outrank innovation based upon this 2007 Conferenceto addressing top management's key strategic
Board survey? They are Excellence in Execution andinterests AND pursuing open innovation at the same
Execution Consistent with Strategy. Clearly, from antime.
internal championing perspective, an Open InnovationHis approach if adopted can address management's
initiative could gain more traction with the CEO if itconcern that an Excellent Process is being promoted
could be promoted within the context of the top twoand followed. He proscribes that the foundation of
goals.Open Innovation is to thoroughly analyze the global
Excellence in Execution implies the application of wellintellectual property landscape for any product or
proven processes and continuous improvement thattechnology, and then to prove this understanding to top
complements an organization's competencies.management in terms of the company's strategic
Consistency with Strategy implies that new initiativesbusiness model. Open Innovation motivated
should be shown as synergistic with the existingtransactions of selling or purchasing intellectual property
strategic model. To the extent that proposedcan then be framed in terms of the top two goals;
innovation strategies are advocated in terminology thatEvaluated with an Excellent Process, and Consistency
is compatible with these top two goals, they stand awith the Corporate Strategy.
greater chance of winning and maintaining topHe reports that many organizations fail to do this
management support.mapping, specifically, they scan and map the global
The Brooks Group has conducted massive studies oftechnologies landscape only at the level of technology
the persuasive value of certain words with respect tovocabulary, not in strategic business model vocabulary
CEOs. To align with top management's top two goalsand visualizations. This leaves open the "human factor"
of Execution Excellence and Consistency withof interpretation, which requires "guesswork" and
Strategy, certain words should not be used inperhaps open ended discussions and therefore
promoting an innovation initiative. Brooks Group"uncontrolled progress"- all are factors that Brooks
suggests that the terms to be avoided at all costs,Group has shown to confound top management.
especially with Technologies Innovation StrategyChesbrough acknowledges that management is well
focused CEO's, include: pioneering, cutting edge,justified in being concerned about the gaps in process
experimental, revolutionary, substantial change, andand communication, and the Conference Board survey
yes... innovative. Instead, Brooks Group's researchreinforces why some innovation teams may be having
proves that winning dialog includes phrases such as:trouble getting or keeping management's attention and
controllable progress, no guesswork, proven andsupport.
tested, designs are similar to, protect what you've built,