Now Is The Time For Process Improvement In Service Organizations

p>Introductionwhich are of no value to the customer or to achieving
U.S. service firms have been hit hard by the currentthe strategic goals of the organization.
downturn in the economy. Business slowdown in theGetting Focused
service sector, combined with increased deregulationI use a four step proven approach for getting focused
and foreign competition, has created a fiercelyon process improvement.
competitive environment. Many service industries haveStep 1: Prepare
experienced difficulty in responding to these newIn this step senior management and mangers organize
circumstances. The magnitude of the problem isand create a Leadership Team and develop a
indicated by the wave of savings and loans closures,compelling vision, mission and set of values. They
financial services bankruptcies, downsizing of realidentify critical success factors and key organizational
estate organizations, and banking mergers nowprocesses, prioritize those processes, and conduct an
occurring.assessment of the organization to determine the
One of the reasons service firms have beencurrent state and what the future state looks like.
particularly hard hit stems from their dismal lack ofThe importance of this step cannot be overlooked
competitiveness. In the recent past, growth in demandbecause facilitative leadership is required to create a
for services was so strong; it gave the impression thatculture that encourages and rewards continuous
service industries were "recession proof." Toiling underprocess improvement. Strong leadership from
this false notion, service firms focused on increasingmanagement is a crucial determinant for maintaining
capacity to satisfy rising demand. They paid very littleprocess improvement.
attention to improving quality and productivity. DuringStep 2: Plan
the 1980s, while productivity in the manufacturingThe second step is creating a strategic continuous
sector was growing at a rate of almost 4 percent perimprovement plan based on the results of the
year, service sector productivity grew less than 1organizational assessment completed in step one. This
percent per year.plan has two components a process improvement
Failure to improve quality and productivity has leftplan so that those key processes important to the
many service firms unable to compete in today'scustomer can be improved, and an organizational
economic environment. Mergers and downsizing are aimprovement plan to prepare the organization for the
short-term response to improving a service firm'sfuture.
competitiveness. With the new competitiveThe process improvement plan is designed to close
environment expected to continue indefinitely, thesethe gap between current and future states and is
changes may be a prelude to a massive shakeoutused to select major improvement opportunities and
within the service sector, similar in size and scope toform process improvement teams to improve the
the restructuring that occurred in the manufacturingprocesses by eliminating non-value -added activities
sector.and closing performance gaps.
Further exacerbating their woes, U.S. service firmsThe organization improvement plan is a roadmap for
need to drastically improve the quality of their outputsestablishing training, rewards and recognition,
and outcomes just to maintain the status quo. Foreigncommunications, and measurement programs that
competitors are making inroads into previouslysupport the process improvement initiative.
untapped markets (financial services, airlines, retailing,Incentive and pay structures for motivating behavior
hospitality) based on their ability to produce high-qualityand performance under continuous process
products and services. They have proven that there isimprovement systems are purposely designed to
nothing mysterious about identifying customer needs,encourage group team-building behavior and
wants, and desires. To the chagrin of their U.S.performance rather than individual effort/output.
counterparts, foreign firms are consistently deliveringRewarding non-group behavior tends to be
service levels that meet or exceed customercounterproductive because financial rewards for
expectations.individual performance send the wrong message to
Consequently, service managers need to recognizeemployees, who in turn will undermine the
that "trimming the fat" and emphasizing "lean andprocess-oriented or team approach.
mean" policies are only short-term, knee-jerk reactionsTraining refers to the skill building and staff
to a lack of competitiveness. Actions such as thesedevelopment that is required for continuous process
do not contribute to high quality, nor do they enhanceimprovement. New capabilities are necessary if
productivity. In fact, if nothing more substantial is doneemployees are to identify and solve problems as a
to improve quality and productivity within the servicesteam. If any of these elements are missing, the change
sector in the U.S., there will be even more rounds ofprocess will break down. Therefore, as employees
downsizing or mergers in response to decliningengage in continuous improvement, they need to
competitiveness.acquire additional skills or be cross-trained to perform
Continuous Improvement Strategiesnew or expanded roles and jobs.
To enhance their competitiveness, service firms needStep 3: Execute
to embrace systems such as Lean, Six Sigma andOnce the process improvement teams have been
practical problem solving, within their organizations toformed and trained it is time to execute-actually
ensure continuous process improvement. Theseimproving the process. Process improvement teams
systems are capable of providing individual providersexamine the process to understand how the process
with the opportunity to meet and then surpass theworks. They spend time analyzing data to determine
challenge of competitors. A philosophy of continuoushow the process is actually working and measure its
process improvement enables a service firm tocurrent performance. The next step is to decide how it
cultivate a process-oriented way of thinking andcan be improved and then test the improved process.
developing strategies that assure continuousImprovement may require refining, redesigning or
improvement involving people at all levels of thereengineering the process. Based on their results the
organizational hierarchy. Such a system requires ateam makes recommendations for approval and
new organizational culture that considers change,implementation.
rather than complacency, the norm.Step 4: Sustain
In a change environment, continuous processThe final step is to sustain a process improvement
improvement by all employees is repeatedlyculture. This step makes process improvement a way
emphasized and supported by senior management.of life in the service organization. It demands carefully
Service firms need to redesign their existing structuremanaged change to ensure the cultural shift from fire
to develop multi-skilled employees, and establish teamfighting to continuous process improvement.
processes for continuous improvement.Sustainability only occurs when all employees not just
Implementing a Process Improvement Strategyprocess improvement teams have the necessary skills
A burning platform for implementing a continuousand the authority to do what is required to fix
improvement system is widespread dissatisfactionprocesses and make lasting improvements.
with the current way in which the organizationA key element of sustain is employee empowerment.
functions. In the case of profit-making serviceThe main drivers behind continuous process
organizations, dissatisfaction is heightened by red ink orimprovement mean that employees are increasingly in
lost market share. However, with respect to non-profitneed of a broader and richer skill set along with the
service organizations such as government, education,authority and responsibility to make customer-facing
and utilities, these kinds of competitive pressures aredecisions. Job skills must be expanded to include not
largely absent. Therefore, organizational dissatisfactiononly the basic work tasks, but also the problem-solving
must be created from within by the leadership team.skills necessary to change the way in which
Top management must provide leadership byorganizational work is performed. This enables them to
establishing a vision for a better organization. Thisrespond to various demands. In other words, they
vision must then be communicated to all employees.must be empowered.
Only by creating a high "discomfort index" canEmployee empowerment means that a firm entrusts
non-profit service organizations hope to create adecision-making authority to frontline workers in
desire, and thereby garner the necessary support, forsituations where such authority traditionally resided
organizational change. To sustain continuoussolely with management. It is important to note that
improvement initiatives, top management should beempowerment cannot be mandated from senior
aware of the crucial role it plays in helping to formulatemanagement. To feel empowered, a number of
the vision, mission and values of the organization. In thispreconditions must be in place: (1) a shared vision and
regard, the role of senior management must changea common set of values must exist organization-wide;
from providing solutions to empowering others within(2) individuals must be properly trained; (3) benefits
the organization.must be fairly and equally distributed; (4) managers
A Focused Approach to Process Improvementmust have faith and confidence in their employees; and
Service organizations should consider a focused(5) the overall culture of the organization must support
approach to process improvement because arisk-taking and not pointing blame.
disciplined, management led, focused approach isSummary
essential if process improvement efforts are toThe service sector of the U.S. economy is undergoing
succeed. The approach must be targeted at improvinga significant transformation. In its wake, traditional
the key business processes that provide a service tomethods like restructuring and reorganizing are stop
a customer. Most key business processes aregap and fleeting solutions. Methods that were popular
cross-functional in nature which means they must bein the early 1980s (downsizing and mergers) no longer
managed across all the functional areas that play rolesensure long-term competitiveness, nor do they remedy
in delivering the services.the inconsistencies caused by knee-jerk reactions. A
Tightly focused process improvement initiativesmore focused approach for improving quality and
produces results and enhances performance. In theproductivity has to be found. One such alternative for
end, the focus should be on the things that are mostincreasing competitiveness is to introduce a focused
important to the organization, but are not being doneapproach to continuous process improvement into
well. Many times service organizations focus on theservice organizations.
wrong things-the things that waste time and effort,