Texas Divorce

Like many marriages that end in divorce in Texas, theenough to meet your goals in a particular instance. In
dissolution of the union between Sarah and Mikeother circumstances, you may decide that the
Brown (names have been changed to protect theelectronic version must be produced in order to include
innocent) was not done under the most cordial ofall background and transmission information. Often
circumstances. The Browns were married fortimes, the full electronic record will be the preferred
seventeen years, owned an enviable home outside ofchoice of attorneys and clients alike as a hard copy
Dallas, Texas, and were the proud parents of threewill not tell the complete story behind a piece of
school-aged children. Mike had been growing noticeablyevidence. Only with the information that is stored on a
more distant over the past couple of years and thecomputer or other electronic device will you be able to
ideal life they presented in public was a much differentextract the time at which a particular transaction
reality behind closed doors. Sarah had a strongoccurred, any information deleted from the current
suspicion that her husband was having an affair and,text, or possibly the date and time at which an online
being adept at searching her way through the newestcorrespondence occurred.
pieces of technology, decided to check out Mike'sIn 2006, Texas was the first state in the country to
personal computer when he was out of town onamend its rules of procedure concerning electronic
business. What Sarah Brown found on her husband'sdiscovery, and one of only a few states to do so
computer hard drive was enough to make her call abefore the federal government made its changes.
divorce lawyer the next morning, and begin anWith this foresight in establishing some guidelines prior
emotional trial that tested the boundaries of theto the procedure set by the federal government,
always-evolving legal world of electronic discovery.Texas has been able to create a different level of
Damaging discovery that an attorney can use againstresponsibility for evidence than what was determined
an opposing spouse party in a divorce action or childby federal legislation three years ago. Ten years ago,
custody proceeding is no longer limited to a trace ofin 1999, our state wrote the Texas Rules of Civil
lipstick left on a white-shirt collar or a mysterious creditProcedure (TRCP) 196.4, which referred exclusively to
card bill found during a quick rummage through aelectronic or magnetic data. This state law requires
briefcase. Today, sophisticated Texas divorce lawyersthat the interested party must specifically request each
are more likely to present evidence that comes fromtype of electronic data and specify the form in which
cell phone records, Facebook comments, MySpacethe interested party wants the data produced. The
pages, deleted e-mails, and visits to web sites thatresponding party may state that the request for
were not quite as hidden as planned.retrieval of particular data or information itself is not
If divorce clients make the mistake of engaging inreasonable, or at least object to the form in which its
behavior that is not conducive to a happy marriage, dopresentation is requested.
not think that they are safe from exposure even whileIf a Texas court orders that the electronic discovery
driving in their cars. Texas divorce attorneys will tellmust be made available, the requesting party is
you that even E-Z Pass toll records can beresponsible for paying the costs to have the
subpoenaed to prove that they were headinginformation prepared. This detail, known as the
somewhere they had no business being. In addition, a"mandatory cost shifting position" is an important legal
suspicious spouse can attach a Global Positioningpoint for both clients and their attorneys to know. With
System (GPS) device to the family car and later useRule196.4 at their disposal, opposing counsel will work
these recorded routes against your client in court.to prove the requests to be unreasonable and you will
These days, the notion that every moment of one's lifebe stuck with the cost of production. The director of
is for the public eye does not just apply to celebritiesthe Institute for the Advancement of the American
and public figures. However, the attorney needs to beLegal System, Rebecca Love Kourlis, has noted that
sure that the evidence collected is done in a way thatbefore the prevalence of e-Discovery, five percent of
does not violate Federal or State privacy laws. Whatdivorce cases actually went to trial. That number has
is the point of collecting every condemning email orfallen to two percent, mostly because the plaintiff
text message if a Federal or Texas State judgefears the costs that would be associated with
decides the documents are inadmissible in court? Doesgathering e-Discovery evidence.
it matter if the proof of an affair was found on a workIf you are a family law attorney who is assisting a
computer, a personal laptop, PDA, or a familyclient through emotional and difficult legal
computer that also is used by the teenage residentscircumstances, I encourage you to be as creative as
for history homework?possible when determining possible requests for
There is the dangerous misconception that activities,electronic discovery. The most effective and proactive
which take place online, are somehow harmless or atparticipants in divorce proceedings will test the
least not as consequential as the same decisionsboundaries in this still-uncertain area of law. Some
made in real-life. Flirting with a woman on the computerdivorce lawyers have even hired investigators with
is not the same as chatting with her in a bar, right?digital forensic tools to do some electronic snooping for
With that said, you should be aware that socialtheir clients. Chances are, if the suspicion is strong, the
networking sites are taking steps to make sure thatelectronic evidence will be found. As Gateano Ferro,
their content is accessible in legal situations. Have youpresident of the American Academy of Matrimonial
read the fine print before typing a comment to yourLawyers, shared in an interview, "In just about every
"friend" on MySpace? This web site and others like itcase now, to some extent, there is some electronic
state that, if legal standards are met, user informationevidence. It has completely changed our (legal) field."
can be passed on to law enforcement agencies andJust ask former Detroit mayor Kwame Kilpatrick how
legal teams involved in divorces.damaging a flirtatious chat on a Blackberry can be to
Family law attorneys who are fighting a child custodyone's marriage and professional standing. All financial
battle also scour the internet looking for possiblerecords certainly should be on the table-items as small
electronic discovery. All that a lawyer needs to find isas romantic dinners and payment for hotel rooms to a
a few photos of a minor child smoking pot or drinkinglarger issue like entire accounts that were kept secret
alcohol posted on a web site and charges of being anmay have relevance in establishing a divorce
unfit parent can be substantiated. Let the words ofsettlement. You should request every text message
Dallas family attorney Mary Jo McCurley serve as aever sent on a cell phone. If or until the courts decide
warning, "For a lawyer, it's almost like a 'ha' moment. It'sthat messages sent to an individual's Facebook page
kind of fun when you see something that you can usecannot be accessed due to a violation of our privacy
as evidence [against] the opposing party." Onlinelaws, get a copy of every word typed! Does your
activities are just as serious as those in the "real world"spouse have an online calendar program, such as
and, to the absolute delight of opposing legal counsel,those offered through Google or Microsoft Outlook,
electronic behavior is recorded and never, ever goeswhich lists daily appointments? If this site shows that
away.he was supposed to be at little Johnny's baseball
Lawmakers and courts at all levels of state andgame at 4:00 pm but you have witnesses to prove
federal government have been scrambling to keep upotherwise, you can make the case that your spouse
with the ever-increasing series of questions that newhas priorities other than his children. Of course, in light
technology brings. What evidence can and should beof the Texas law detailed earlier, make sure you have
admissible in court? In what form or predicate shouldconstructed convincing arguments that all of the
the attorney present the evidence? When is the linematerial you need is reasonable in both its content and
protecting the right to privacy crossed? Throughrequested format.
amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil ProcedureWhen it comes to electronic discovery and the Texas
on December 1, 2006, Congress enacted the primarylegal system, there are still many more questions than
guidelines used to answer such questions and othersestablished areas of agreement. Divorce attorneys,
on the federal level. Through Rule 34(a), Congresswhen they search for case law to be used as binding
added electronically stored information (ESI) as aor persuasive precedent concerning admissibility of
category of discoverable information. To ensure thatelectronic evidence, find only a short list of documents
this amendment maintained its relevance as newto review. And, with new technology emerging every
technologies are invented, ESI was defined to beday that is capable of storing financial records,
"writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, soundpersonal conversations, and searches of web sites
recordings, images, and other data or data compilationsthat are far from G-rated, family law judges can
stored in any medium from which information can beexpect that every new estranged couple that comes
obtained." By purposefully using the language, "in anybefore them in a courtroom brings the possibility of
medium," in the future, the federal courts can requireunchartered territory concerning evidence and what
data from technology not even invented yet. If yourightfully belongs on the public record. While the general
have had any difficulty keeping up with the newstatutes for the submission of electronic discovery
electronic devices that have come on the market inhave been written on both the federal and state level,
just the last five years (how many versions of thethe intentionally broad language included in the
iPhone and Blackberry are there now?), you canamendments will mean that difficult judgment calls
understand why the federal lawmakers left such ashould be expected for some time to come. Only time
wide open door.will tell how our judicial system decides to weigh an
The corresponding Federal Rule 34(b) measure,individual's right to privacy versus the right of an
passed at the same time as Federal Rule 34(a), allowsaccuser to have all possible evidence at his or her
the requesting party to determine the form in whichdisposal.
evidence is presented. Maybe a paper printout is