The Venice Biennale and Nationalism

I was recently thinking about the work of Ragnar 
Kjartansson, the young artist representing Iceland atNow, over a century later, the Venice Biennale is still a
this year's Venice Biennale (whom I blogged about amajor art fair--one of the most important in the
few weeks ago). Isn't it interesting, I thought to myself,world--which has expanded to include satellite fairs,
that his work is supposed to represent the entirefestivals within the biennal (such as film festivals) and
country of Iceland. What makes his work distinctlymore. But the tradition of national pavilions remains,
Icelandic? And what is so American about Brucedespite the fact that we undeniably live in a time of
Nauman's conceptual pieces, for that matter? With thepostnationalism. Postnationalism, for those who need
advent of technology--and particularly that speedya definition, is the understanding that with the
mechanism which keeps us all "connected", theglobalization of economy, business, communication,
internet--the art world has indubitably expanded toand yes, the arts, we no longer self-identify in national
international scope, but how many artists think interms, but global ones. 
national terms? To put it more bluntly: is it outdated to 
be conceiving of art fairs and biennials by nationality?British artist Steve McQueen addressed these issues
 of nationalism at the Venice Biennale by showing a film
The Venice Biennale has a long history stretching backthat captures the shabby, derelict ruins of the national
to 1895, when it was one of many international fairspavilions before they are made spic and span for the
created in the spirit of internationalism and curiosity,art fair.  According to an article from The
eclecticism and exoticism. The nationalistic chauvinismIndependent, he noted, "[In the film] the American
of the Venice Biennale, World Expo (also calledpavilion looks like a real façade, it was not particularly
World's Fair) and other fairs was especially fresh;solid, it had boarded windows, there was a siren going
many European countries had undergone revolutionsoff. It was derelict. But see it now (at the biennale) and
and governmental changes in the nineteenth century,its all new and shiny."
resulting in completely new states. Germany was 
unified into a modern nation-state in 1871; Italy finalizedA critique of the superficiality of national chauvinism is
its unification with the repossession of the Papal Stateapparent. As McQueen said himself, "These [national]
from the French in 1870; France, too, had establishedlines are always blurred. The idea of nationalism is
the Third Republic at the end of the Franco-Prussianimposed on us. At certain moments, these lines are
war, also in 1870 (dates taken from Wikipedia). Theseblurred, and sometimes they don't exist."
toddler nation-states, among others, were proud and 
eager to formalize a national cultural heritage to solidifyI understand that the national organization of the
a political one. exhibition is a very basic method of efficient
 organization: with hundreds of thousands of artists
The other function of the world cultural fair was, ofacross the world, the curators need some kind of
course, educational. Although a strong bourgeois classsystematization, and the easiest way to do that is to
had emerged in the nineteenth century, it would still behave a curatorial team in Madrid take care of the
several decades before world travel became aSpaniards, a curatorial team in Buenos Aires scope out
pastime for the middle class; travel was still athe Argentine offerings, etc. But must the artists then
time-consuming and expensive enterprise, exclusivebe exhibited by their country? What if the Biennale
only to the wealthy. The world fairs and exhibitionswas organized more thematically? The pavilion of
were the only means to introduce most Europeans toartists who address political persecution? The pavilion
the cultural and artistic heritages of many countries,of artists who address environmental issues? In this
near and far. The assemblage andpostnational world, would thematic pavilions not more
compartmentalization of cultures did also have that theswiftly highlight our human similarities rather than
effect of Darwinian scrutiny or circus sideshow awe,artificial national differences? I ask again: How
as Europeans marveled at the exotic people andrelevant are these national divides in the art world?
places represented.